Mini Content Marketing comparison of websites for edoc.rki.de

tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de

65%
Change competitor

rki.de

34%
Change competitor

ssoar.info

20%
Change competitor

edoc.rki.de

19%

edoc.hu-berlin.de

15%
Change competitor

Our algorithms collect information, determine the relevant competitors and compare how these pages perform in direct comparison in fields: search engine rankings and traffic, social media activity and reach, popularity on other websites (backlinks) and the technical aspects of the website itself (user experience and many more). The selection of competitors can be improved by any visitor at any time by clicking on them and selecting an additional one or replacing existing ones. The displayed score is made up of metrics, which we present below. It shows percentage success measurement (snapshot) compared to the competition. The higher the percentage, the better performance. This area belongs to the research work of the Internet Institute Zurich and does not guarantee the accuracy of the data. For precise evaluations, we recommend opening an account.

Submit better competitors

SEO: Number of expected visitors from the search engine

Expected volume of visitors based on the visibility in the search engine (presence on the first search results page for keywords that have significant monthly demand. Calculated thanks to public statistics on click rate). The value should not be compared with Google analytics numbers. The key figures are intended to be representative for the search engine visibility of a domain.

Social media statistics

Selected social media statistics on reach (number of followers / fans), activity (number of posts) and engagement (e.g. number of likes achieved for all posts).

This area belongs to the research work of the Internet Institute Zurich and does not guarantee the accuracy of the data. For precise evaluations, we recommend opening an account.

Metric edoc.rki.de rki.de ssoar.info edoc.hu-berlin.de tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de
Twitter followers x x x x x
Twitter following (account is following) x x x x x
Twitter likes x x x x x
Instagram followers x x x x x
Instagram following (account is following) x x x x x
Youtube subscribers x x x x x
Youtube comments x x x x x
Youtube videos x x x x x

Number of referring external websites - an important source of visitors

Number of backlinks and other important metrics

Metric edoc.rki.de rki.de ssoar.info edoc.hu-berlin.de tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de
Number of Referring Backlinks (Content Popularity) (day) 49,355 1,693,460 315,482 536,235 20,067
Number of Referring Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 1,173 19,516 2,142 3,198 857
Number of URLs found in the index (day) 110,173 111,728,449 831,582 318,874 63,281
Number of IPs that refer to domain (day) 995 10,761 1,841 2,654 760
Number of subnets that refer to domain (day) 763 6,090 1,528 2,096 663
Number of Referring .EDU und .EDU - related Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 5 44 117 139 27
Number of Backlinks from .EDU and .EDU - related Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 14 228 2,046 3,039 204
Number of governmental and .gov - related domains that refer to domain (day) x 8 3 7 4
Number of government and .gov - related external backlinks that link to domain (day) x 82 5 9 5
The exact number of educational domains that refer to domain (day) 3 10 44 48 15
Number of Backlinks from .EDU Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 10 33 923 2,233 145
The exact number of government domains that refer to domain (day) x 4 1 5 3
The exact number of government links that refer to domain (day) x 62 1 5 4
Average number of outgoing links to unique domains for that domain (day) 0 0 1 0 3
The number of outgoing links for this domain (day) 0 1 12 0 3
Average number of internal links for domain (day) 18 173 14 14 42
Link Strength of Referring Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 42 47 46 46 37
Authority of Referring Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 26 45 27 45 23
TrustMetric value for domain (day) - Majestic metric 26 45 27 45 23

Keywords research

Frequent words and word combinations of the group of chosen websites and statistics on the occurrence and monthly demand in Google. Find keywords that are often used by competitors and have demand in the search engine.

Usability scores

User Experience Performance of the main domain on various devices (100 - is the best performance) und information about website loading times.

Page title
edoc - Dokumentenserver des Robert-Koch-Instituts
Desktop speed score 81
Mobile speed score 68
Mobile usability score 65
Number of all page resources 8
Number of static page resources 7
Number of JS page resources 2
Number of styles (CSS) page resources 1
HTML response weight 14 kb
CSS response weight 21 kb
Images response weight 27 kb
JS response weight 83 kb

Usability - optimization suggestions

Selected advices to optimize loading times.

Cache (desktop) by setting expiry date for
http://edoc.rki.de/css/style.css
http://edoc.rki.de/img/dini_2013.jpg
http://edoc.rki.de/img/logo_a.jpg
Cache (mobile) by setting expiry date for
http://edoc.rki.de/css/style.css
http://edoc.rki.de/img/dini_2013.jpg
http://edoc.rki.de/img/logo_a.jpg
Minify your CSS files (desktop)
http://edoc.rki.de/css/style.css - 2.5KiB (12%)
Minify your CSS files (mobile)
http://edoc.rki.de/css/style.css - 2.5KiB (12%)
Minify HTML files (desktop)
http://edoc.rki.de/ - 1.9KiB (14%)
Minify HTML files (mobile)
http://edoc.rki.de/ - 1.9KiB (14%)
Optimize image files (desktop)
http://edoc.rki.de/img/logo_a.jpg - 10KiB (69%)
http://edoc.rki.de/img/dini_2013.jpg - 6.6KiB (61%)
Some texts on your page renders in a way that may be difficult for some of your visitors to read. (mobile)
Configure a viewport for mobile page, ex.
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. (mobile)

Summary of some information about this domain and its competition

Main

  • Die Domain achieved a Score of 649.
  • The competing domain ssoar.info has achieved a score of 682

Content

  • The word or combination of words with the worst "Count on Page" result is institutsedoc dokumentenserver (based first 10 subpages of the domain under investigation).
  • 158 words or phrases (two word combinations) were found on the main domain.
  • The main domain enables visitors to subscribe to their newsletter list.
  • The competitor tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de has achieved a value of 663 for the metric: "Number of referring domains from different IP C blocks".
  • The competitor tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de achieved a value of 145 for the metric: "Number of backlinks from .EDU domains (daily value)".

Social media

  • A link to Twitter has been found on the domain rki.de.
  • 0% of this group of domains has a Facebook account.
  • 20% of this group of domains has a Twitter account.
  • 0% of this group of domains has a Instagram account.
  • 0% of this group of domains has a Youtube account.

Seo

  • Of all the URLs found in the domain edoc.hu-berlin.de, "https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/handle/18452/18201" is the most frequently found URL in the search results.
  • The best position ever found for the competitor rki.de was 1 and it was found the keyword :keyword.
  • The best position ever found for the main domain was 10 and it was found the keyword :keyword.
  • The average position in the search engine rankings for the main domain is 54.
  • The average number of visitors expected from the search engine for the competitors websites is 153261.

Server

  • When the homepage of the competitor rki.de is loaded once, 47 objects are downloaded (files, JS scripts, etc.).
  • The CSS file on the competitor ssoar.info http://www.ssoar.info/fileadmin/styles/01_layouts_basics/css/screen/content.css could be compressed to save 32% - 2.4KiB kb.
  • The CSS of the main domain website accounts for14% of all data transfers.
  • The compression of the HTML together with INLINE CSS and JS enables the main domain website to save 1.9KiB kb each time the page is loaded.
  • Due to the font size being smaller than optimal, some texts on the main domain website may appear illegible to visitors on the mobile device.